Armah Properties Sdn Bhd v Ahmad Zulkifli Bin Ahmad Razali [2006] 5 AMR 515

About This Case

Property LawRemoval of Caveats

LawyerMansheel Kaur

This is a High Court decision in relation to removal of caveats.

Shoddy road works irk residents
Do not pay for road resurfacing work, public urged
Residents breach MBPJ guidelines to stay safe
A city for the elderly
Caught On Camera
‘Probe for answers, please’
MBPJ increases development expenditure by 128%
Turning up the heat on parking bay hoggers
Divider along Jalan Timur is recommended to improve traffic flow
Ten-year-old girl awarded highest accident claim in the country
Landowners contest High Court default judgment
Breach of contract: Amelia Henderson ordered to pay RM10,000 in nominal compensation
Court declares Shahrizat properly elected
Chua Muk Kwee, Re; Ex-Parte UMBC Finance Berhad (1994) 1 AMR 17
Jaafar Mustafa Bin Awang Mat v Puan Shahrizhat @ Shahrizat Bte Abdul Jalil [1995] 3 AMR 2346
Cheok Swee Lee & Ors v Loo Choo Teng & Ors [1997] MLJU 198
Ibu Pejabat Korporat, KTM Berhad v Hashim Kamaruddin [1999] 1 ILR 204
Ibu Pejabat Korporat, Keretapi Tanah Melayu (KTM) Berhad v Hashim Kamaruddin [1999] 1 ILR 778
State Public Services Commission, Sarawak v Sarjit Singh Khaira [1999] 1 MLJ 618
Genisys Integrated Engineers Pte Ltd v UEM Genisys Sdn Bhd & Ors [2000] MLJU 766; [2000] CLJU 375; [2000] 1 LNS 375
J. Raju A/L Kerapaya v Commerce International Merchant Bankers Berhad [2000] 3 MLJ 177; [2000] 3 CLJ 104
Re Low Tung Kwai; Ex P Perwira Affin Bank Bhd [2001] 6 MLJ 39
Armah Properties Sdn Bhd v Ahmad Zulkifli Bin Ahmad Razali [2006] 5 AMR 515
Dean John Smith v Sean Kok Wah [2013] 1 SMC 24; [2012] 5 LNS 18
Razaleigh’s Gua Musang victory rules null and void

About This Case

Case Study